CC

Performance Analysis

GHL × Google Ads · Joined Attribution

Tenders
v1.0 · Full-funnel ROAS

True Marketing Performance

Joins live GHL CRM data with your Google Ads spend to show what actually pays back — campaign-level ROAS, lead lifecycle, and where to put more (or less) of next week's budget.

Go High Level
Checking connection…
Google Ads
Checking cache…
Open
Attribution Match
—
Leads (GHL)
—
All sources
Quoted
—
—
Instructed
—
—
Revenue
—
—
Lead Lifecycle Funnel

Waiting for data

Once GHL syncs, the funnel will populate.

Leads & Revenue Over Time
Ad Spend
—
Google Ads
Attributed Quotes
—
—
Attributed Revenue
—
—
True ROAS
—
Revenue ÷ Spend
Campaign Performance Sorted by ROAS

No campaign data yet

Load Google Ads CSVs in the Google Ads tool first, then sync GHL to match attribution.

Spend vs Revenue by Campaign
Lead quality compares sources on three dimensions: average quote value, quote → instruction close rate, and time to close. Higher-quality sources deserve more budget even if their cost-per-lead is higher.
Quality by Source

No quality breakdown yet

Quality scoring needs GHL opportunities with values and pipeline stages.

Close Rate by Source
Solo-marketer mode. Each panel returns the single most important action from the joined data — with estimated time and £ impact. No overwhelming task lists.

Weekly Headline

A 200-word summary tying spend → leads → revenue → next week's focus.

Where to put MORE budget

The single best opportunity to grow revenue this week — campaign, time, and £ upside.

Where to put LESS budget

Highest-spending campaigns with weakest ROAS — what to pause or cap.

Funnel leak diagnosis

Where in the lead → quote → instructed funnel you're losing the most value, and what to fix.

Quality-first targeting

Which sources bring serious enquiries vs tyre-kickers — and how to bid accordingly.
Done